On Sep 14, 2010, at 8:24 PM, Lisandro Dalcin wrote: > On 14 September 2010 21:55, Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote: >> >> On Sep 14, 2010, at 6:24 PM, Lisandro Dalcin wrote: >> >>> 1) If mpicc is in $PATH, then petscvariables will get PCC=mpicc. >>> Perhaps it should get the full path instead? >>> >>> 2) I think CXX and FC variables should be renames to PCXX and PFC. The >>> former names can easily conflict with CXX and FC defined in user >>> makefiles for use with non-MPI sources. >> >> Then we should also get rid of CC >> >> Essentially you are saying we should remove all "traditional" use of >> these variables from our makefiles? I agree doing that might be a good idea. >> But doesn't it contradict your attempt to try hard to conform to standard >> usage for things? >> > > Sorry, I need a clarification: Could you tell me why PETSc makefiles > uses PCC instead of the "traditional" CC? Is it just because PCC > could be CC or CXX depending on --with-c-language?
Yes that is one reason and may be the only reason. Barry > > > > -- > Lisandro Dalcin > --------------- > CIMEC (INTEC/CONICET-UNL) > Predio CONICET-Santa Fe > Colectora RN 168 Km 472, Paraje El Pozo > Tel: +54-342-4511594 (ext 1011) > Tel/Fax: +54-342-4511169
