On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 17:45, Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> hmm, is there any reason we can't/shouldn't use a typedef for our VecType > (and its many friends)? I think the issue is because "const" is scoped differently for a macro than for the typedef. typedef char *Foo; now "const Foo" means "char *const" instead of "const char *". -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20101027/6a075cc1/attachment.html>
