Lisandro just pointed out that it does not return a range, which is indeed confusing. Two options:
1. Keep the current interface but find a better name. Low impact on users. 2. Keep the name, and make it return offset arrays of length m+1,n+1,p+1 (the closest analogy to Vec and mat OwnershipRanges). Higher impact on users, would require revisiting a decent amount of code in DA, but probably not in a deep way. Jed -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20101129/ff522a83/attachment.html>
