On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 23:21, Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> Crap. That means that the output from this newly modifed function is not > what is needed by the creation routine. In fact there exists > DMDASetOwnershipRanges(). What are we going to do with that? Change the > meaning of DMDASetOwnershipRanges() arguments (and hence also the meaning of > the final optional arguments to the DMDACreate3d() and 2d)? For uniformaty > we need to change those also. But the changed form is more cumbersome and > less natural for users, is it not? Or is it ok to change all of them? We > don't have a concept of setting global ownership values for Vec and Mat > (cause the meaning is a little different). Maybe a name change is in order? That was my original thought, either change the meaning of all these things or change the name. Jed -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20101129/7a8008c0/attachment.html>
