1) It violated the PETSc style guides of NOT having _'s in the names of
XXXType.
The reason we have the guides is make parts of PETSc as consistent as
possible, hence easier to remember and know immediately what type of thing
something is.
2) It was very close name to the PETSC_VIEWER_XXXX_ making code harder for
humans to parse quickly.
Barry
On Jun 1, 2010, at 2:55 PM, Srinath Vadlamani wrote:
> Why do:
> PETSC_VIEWER_XXXX is now PETSCVIEWERXXX
> <>Srinath
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20100601/dafbce1f/attachment.html>
