Thanks. As I am new to the developers list, should we expect these changes to be implemented in PETSc 3.2?
<>Srinath On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote: > > 1) It violated the PETSc style guides of NOT having _'s in the names of > XXXType. > The reason we have the guides is make parts of PETSc as consistent > as possible, hence easier to remember and know immediately what type of > thing something is. > 2) It was very close name to the PETSC_VIEWER_XXXX_ making code harder > for humans to parse quickly. > > Barry > > On Jun 1, 2010, at 2:55 PM, Srinath Vadlamani wrote: > > Why do: > * > > - PETSC_VIEWER_XXXX is now PETSCVIEWERXXX > > <>Srinath > * > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20100601/46e3890b/attachment.html>
