On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 6:28 PM, Satish Balay <balay at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Jan 2010, Barry Smith wrote: > > > > > On Jan 26, 2010, at 6:04 PM, Matthew Knepley wrote: > > > > > Pull PETSc and try again. > > > > NO! Pull BuildSystem and try again. Send configure.log and > reconfigure.py if > > it fails. > > The bug exists as of petsc-dev from today. > >>>> > ValueError: The option --known-sizeof-void_p should probably be > --known-sizeof-void-p > <<<< > > > Matt, revert any silly changes you just made to petsc-dev to fix this > > nonexistent problem. > > This fix brings up other things. > > >>>>> > ValueError: The option --known-sizeof-long_long should probably be > --known-sizeof-long-long > <<<<< > Ah, will you make a list or should i? Matt > All can run with '--with-batch=1' on their machines to reproduce the > problem. [and see if their fixes fix it or not] > > Satish > -- What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments lead. -- Norbert Wiener -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20100126/bad06cb6/attachment.html>
