On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 6:44 PM, Satish Balay <balay at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Jan 2010, Matthew Knepley wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 6:41 PM, Satish Balay <balay at mcs.anl.gov> wrote: > > > > > The following change gets configure going. > > > > > > But I think Barry is looking at a different fix.. [if not - I can push > > > this] > > > > > > Satish > > > > > > - for exc in ['superlu_dist', 'PETSC_ARCH', 'PETSC_DIR', > > > 'CXX_CXXFLAGS', 'LD_SHARED', 'CC_LINKER_FLAGS', 'CXX_LINKER_FLAGS', > > > 'FC_LINKER_FLAGS', 'AR_FLAGS', 'C_VERSION', 'CXX_VERSION', > > > 'FC_VERSION','qd_dd', 'void_p']: > > > + for exc in ['superlu_dist', 'PETSC_ARCH', 'PETSC_DIR', > > > 'CXX_CXXFLAGS', 'LD_SHARED', 'CC_LINKER_FLAGS', 'CXX_LINKER_FLAGS', > > > 'FC_LINKER_FLAGS', 'AR_FLAGS', 'C_VERSION', 'CXX_VERSION', > > > 'FC_VERSION','qd_dd', > > > 'known-sizeof-void_p','known-sizeof-long_long','known-sizeof-size_t']: > > > > > > > Just use void_p, long_long, size_t since it does a find(). > > I thought of using full options to minimize false positives. > But it ugly, and a false positive only impacts our kludgy "debugging". Matt > Satish > -- What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments lead. -- Norbert Wiener -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20100126/2bd0b808/attachment.html>
