This issue is not in petsc-3.3 but looks like it was introduced at: http://petsc.cs.iit.edu/petsc/petsc-dev/rev/2ab3e57475d7
I switched nightly builds back from petsc33 to petsc-dev on june 27-ish.. satish On Thu, 5 Jul 2012, Barry Smith wrote: > > On Jul 5, 2012, at 4:19 AM, Jed Brown wrote: > > > This is years old, but in any case, fixed now: > > http://petsc.cs.iit.edu/petsc/petsc-dev/rev/30f9a34e118e > > How can it possibly be years old? You're saying that this message has > appeared every night during the nightly tests and every time someone did make > alltests and during every test Satish made before the release? > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 10:17 PM, Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote: > > > > /bin/sh: -c: line 0: syntax error near unexpected token `done' > > /bin/sh: -c: line 0: `/Users/barrysmith/Src/petsc-dev/arch-gnu/bin/mpiexec > > -n 1 ./ex37 -explicit_is 0 > ex37_1.tmp 2>&1; /usr/bin/diff -w > > output/ex37_1.out ex37_1.tmp || echo > > /Users/barrysmith/Src/petsc-dev/src/vec/vec/examples/tests "\nPossible > > problem with ex37_1, diffs above > > \n========================================="; done; /bin/rm -f -f > > ex37_1.tmp' > > make[7]: [runex37] Error 2 (ignored) > > /bin/sh: -c: line 0: syntax error near unexpected token `done' > > /bin/sh: -c: line 0: `/Users/barrysmith/Src/petsc-dev/arch-gnu/bin/mpiexec > > -n 1 ./ex37 -explicit_is 1 > ex37_1.tmp 2>&1; /usr/bin/diff -w > > output/ex37_1.out ex37_1.tmp || echo > > /Users/barrysmith/Src/petsc-dev/src/vec/vec/examples/tests "\nPossible > > problem with ex37_1, diffs above > > \n========================================="; done; /bin/rm -f -f > > ex37_1.tmp' > > make[7]: [runex37_1] Error 2 (ignored) > > /bin/sh: -c: line 0: syntax error near unexpected token `done' > > /bin/sh: -c: line 0: `/Users/barrysmith/Src/petsc-dev/arch-gnu/bin/mpiexec > > -n 2 ./ex37 -explicit_is 0 > ex37_2.tmp 2>&1; /usr/bin/diff -w > > output/ex37_2.out ex37_2.tmp || echo > > /Users/barrysmith/Src/petsc-dev/src/vec/vec/examples/tests "\nPossible > > problem with ex37_2, diffs above > > \n========================================="; done; /bin/rm -f -f > > ex37_2.tmp' > > make[7]: [runex37_2] Error 2 (ignored) > > > > At least test your rule before pushing > > > > > > > > > >
