On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Jed Brown <jedbrown at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com> wrote: > >> I just do regexp. >> > > Okay, are you missing these sort and grep parts? (regexen are so > fragile...) > I just get out the args+# procs and output file > > >> >> >>> I like the semantic information of having multiple tests using the same >>> base options and/or comparing to the same output (rather than normalizing >>> when you specify the tests). >>> >> >> Shell is not the place for that. Years of putting crapy shell into >> makefiles before having to pull it out >> should have taught us something. >> > > I agree, but if we can automatically parse those, we can replace them > wholesale with something better. > I think this is overkill. There were only 2 of these in Vec and 3 in SNES (I think) Matt -- What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments lead. -- Norbert Wiener -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20120705/a4fb018d/attachment.html>
