El 18/07/2012, a las 17:45, Jed Brown escribi?: > On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 10:22 AM, Jose E. Roman <jroman at dsic.upv.es> wrote: > El 18/07/2012, a las 15:05, Jed Brown escribi?: > > > MatMultHermitianTranspose could have a default implementation in terms of > > the others. Then it would work in all cases, right? > > > > Do you mean VecConjugate(x) plus MatMultTranspose(A,x,y) plus VecConjugate(y) > ?? > I guess this would work. > > In the PETSc implementation, right? > >
How about the attached patch? If you agree, should I push to petsc-3.3? or petsc-dev only? Jose -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: patch-hermitian-transpose Type: application/octet-stream Size: 1308 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20120720/9c62be5c/attachment.obj>
