Jose,
Looks ok to me for you to push for 3.3 and dev.
Barry
On Jul 20, 2012, at 4:20 AM, Jose E. Roman wrote:
>
> El 18/07/2012, a las 17:45, Jed Brown escribi?:
>
>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 10:22 AM, Jose E. Roman <jroman at dsic.upv.es>
>> wrote:
>> El 18/07/2012, a las 15:05, Jed Brown escribi?:
>>
>>> MatMultHermitianTranspose could have a default implementation in terms of
>>> the others. Then it would work in all cases, right?
>>>
>>
>> Do you mean VecConjugate(x) plus MatMultTranspose(A,x,y) plus
>> VecConjugate(y) ??
>> I guess this would work.
>>
>> In the PETSc implementation, right?
>>
>>
>
> How about the attached patch?
> If you agree, should I push to petsc-3.3? or petsc-dev only?
>
> Jose
>
> <patch-hermitian-transpose>
