His point is that we can't tell it has anything to do with netcdf from the non-verbose output. On Sep 12, 2012 10:13 PM, "Satish Balay" <balay at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Sean Farley wrote: > > > Just a quick note from > > http://petsc.cs.iit.edu/petsc/BuildSystem/rev/b8702c0c34ab > > > > "libnetcdf_c++.a not created by the new version?" > > > > Correct. Starting with version 4.2 NetCDF has split C++ and Fortran > > bindings into separate packages. See their announcement for more > > information, > > > > http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/blogs/news/entry/netcdf_4_2_release > > > > P.S. Is it that hard to make the first line of the commit message the > > summary? E.g. "netcdf: update to 4.2.1.1"? In both mercurial and git, > > the first line of the commit message is used as the subject. This > > makes reading commits *much* easier. > > Sure - I felt that was a sufficient summary - but you appear to differ on > that. > > Satish > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20120912/d15876d3/attachment.html>
