On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 10:02 AM, Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> Who the hell did that? :-) > You did, naturally. ;-) http://petsc.cs.iit.edu/petsc/petsc-dev/rev/18da6d3cac89 > > and even BLAS/Lapack. > > Ok, you convinced me. I'm fine with the macros. Maybe better names? Are > the umfpack names ok, they don't have PETSc in them. > I don't know why you chose those names. They are private to umfpack.c so it's only a problem if Umfpack itself starts using the umfpack_UMF_ prefix. What would be like PETSc declaring Petsc_PETSC_MatCreate() which seems unlikely enough that I don't mind leaving it (mostly to preserve usefulness of "hg annotate"). -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20120921/58be28a1/attachment.html>
