On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 10:38 PM, "C. Bergstr?m" <cbergstrom at pathscale.com>wrote:
> On 11/ 5/12 10:13 AM, Matthew Knepley wrote: > >> I am tired of wasting time on their stupid bugs which we report but are >> never fixed. Is there a way to retaliate without grenades? >> > Switch over to HPX? > http://stellar.cct.lsu.edu/**tag/hpx/<http://stellar.cct.lsu.edu/tag/hpx/> > > I'm not sure it's at a point where it can handle petsc, but keep it in > mind for 2013. I'm cc'ing one of the devs who is probably not subscribed, > but can answer questions. (bandwidth permitting and maybe delayed until > @SC12 or after) > ----------- > Option 2 - We (PathScale) have been considering to take on shipping a > supported version of OpenMPI for some time. If anyone would be interested > in add-on support or just paying a bounty to fix bugs - We may be able to > work it out. (Not the perfect open source answer, but maybe it's better > (cheaper?) than grenades.. > > Which bugs are you specifically interested in getting fixed? > When they install to a non-standard location, they do not add RPATH support for the library link in their compiler wrappers. Matt -- What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments lead. -- Norbert Wiener -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20121104/cd19e589/attachment.html>
