On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Jed Brown <jedbrown at mcs.anl.gov> wrote: >> >> >> On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com> >> wrote: >>>> >>>> Can you quantify your productivity gains that come from pushing >>>> checkpoints instead of waiting for a semantically meaningful point to merge >>>> and push? >>> >>> >>> I can quantify the losses from the changed you propose, which is all I >>> need to do. >> >> >> Do share. > > > Its more work for me. Clearly you are asking me to do something I do not > currently do. A loss. > >>> >>> There are no "gains" from a baseline. This is >>> a point I have made multiple times. Changes must be justified. >> >> >> I provided a long list of justifications that you have not responded to. >> There is a great deal of empirical evidence to back my claims. > > > I have responded to each and every point carefully. You need to listen.
I have been following this conversation closely but have not seen you respond to any of the points on code review, new bugs, etc. I have seen you complain that you don't want to change your habits, though.
