On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Jed Brown <jedbrown at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com>wrote: > >> Can you quantify your productivity gains that come from pushing >>> checkpoints instead of waiting for a semantically meaningful point to merge >>> and push? >>> >> >> I can quantify the losses from the changed you propose, which is all I >> need to do. >> > > Do share. > Its more work for me. Clearly you are asking me to do something I do not currently do. A loss. > There are no "gains" from a baseline. This is >> a point I have made multiple times. Changes must be justified. >> > > I provided a long list of justifications that you have not responded to. > There is a great deal of empirical evidence to back my claims. > I have responded to each and every point carefully. You need to listen. Matt -- What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments lead. -- Norbert Wiener -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20130203/72fa6d87/attachment-0001.html>
