On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 12:27 PM, Sean Farley <sean at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >> > >> Pushing as a checkpointing mechanism discourages review. > > > > > > Review should happend when the section is complete, but this is no way > > implies that you should not push until it is complete. > > There seems to be a misunderstanding: You can push all you want ? to > your own repo (we're using a DVCS for crying out loud). Rebase with > petsc-dev and then all your changesets will be grouped together and > easier to review. > I do not misunderstand you Sean. Matt -- What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments lead. -- Norbert Wiener -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20130203/7bc2f768/attachment-0001.html>
