On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 6:52 PM, Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> > On Feb 8, 2013, at 11:04 PM, Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com> wrote: > > > There are some broken examples in SNES that I would like to clean up in > preparation for real output checking there. They are > > > > ex5: I think we just overwrite the solutions with the current stuff > > > > ex22 and ex58: Barry this look like you, and the results are really > different > > The new values are no less valid than the old so just overwrite the old > outputs. Okay, pushed. Next step, insert Python validator for output, possibly with more structure. Matt > > > > Once regression passes, I am going to mess around with the output > > a little so I can get it easily interpreted by Python, and then checked > > automatically with nice tolerances. > > > > Matt > > > > -- > > What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their > experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their > experiments lead. > > -- Norbert Wiener > > -- What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments lead. -- Norbert Wiener -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20130209/c1eca940/attachment.html>
