On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 7:15 PM, Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 6:52 PM, Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote: > >> >> On Feb 8, 2013, at 11:04 PM, Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > There are some broken examples in SNES that I would like to clean up in >> preparation for real output checking there. They are >> > >> > ex5: I think we just overwrite the solutions with the current stuff >> > >> > ex22 and ex58: Barry this look like you, and the results are really >> different >> >> The new values are no less valid than the old so just overwrite the >> old outputs. > > > Okay, pushed. > The ex5 output changed here, for a justifiable reason, though the code got much messier to implement this change. https://bitbucket.org/petsc/petsc-dev/commits/4c6428f5d4f1623dc2ea08f9e0be167f2bcf9c69 Tests output needs to be updated when an intentional change like this is made. I didn't bisect for ex22 or ex58, but perhaps it's a similar issue. > Next step, insert Python validator for output, possibly with more > structure. > What's your plan for implementing this? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20130209/7f0713b1/attachment.html>
