On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 6:52 PM, Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com> wrote:
> Still like that better than _r. Reentrancy is not a subset or superset of thread-safety. I certainly wasn't suggesting that we use _r to indicate thread-safety. Rather, I was asking whether we should use a shorter (possibly single-character) identifier, and perhaps something that indicated "CPU threads" so as not to confuse with device kernels. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20130216/011e49c1/attachment.html>
