_k _t ?
On Feb 16, 2013, at 7:06 PM, Jed Brown <jedbrown at mcs.anl.gov> wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 6:52 PM, Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com> wrote: > Still like that better than _r. > > Reentrancy is not a subset or superset of thread-safety. I certainly wasn't > suggesting that we use _r to indicate thread-safety. Rather, I was asking > whether we should use a shorter (possibly single-character) identifier, and > perhaps something that indicated "CPU threads" so as not to confuse with > device kernels.
