On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 6:16 PM, Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> Why is there a #requirespackage 'PETSC_HAVE_PCBDDC' ? > > Having things like this means that when someone is updating code globally > changes to locations like these do not get tested before being pushed and > hence is likely broken. > > That directory appears to depend on PARMETIS so should have that > dependency listed in the makefile instead > IIRC, the code does not work with complex either. It was put into the repository mostly because we don't have a good system for supporting forks. It was off by default because the code was unstable and untested. There is an example now (src/ksp/ksp/examples/tutorials/ex59.c) so I think we can remove the --with-pcbddc option. Stefano, does this sound right to you? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20130304/16e79522/attachment.html>
