On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 6:25 PM, Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> The makefile should be marked as not supporting complex > > > It was put into the repository mostly because we don't have a good > system for supporting forks.\ > > I thought bitbucket now gives a system for handling forks? > Yeah, this was before we used bitbucket, but we still haven't established a workflow conducive to supporting downstream forks. > > It was off by default because the code was unstable and untested. There > is an example now (src/ksp/ksp/examples/tutorials/ex59.c) so I think we can > remove the --with-pcbddc option. Stefano, does this sound right to you? > > Or it could be a good test example for a PETSc plugin repository? > Yes, either way. Stefano, if you feel it is reasonably stable, can you remove the --with-pcbddc guard and put in the necessary restrictions (#requirespackage 'PETSC_HAVE_PARMETIS', #requiresscalar real)? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20130304/35b8860b/attachment.html>
