On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 10:14 AM, Mark F. Adams <mark.adams at columbia.edu>wrote:
> I thought the primary mission of options_left was to catch spelling > mistakes. > > (This is also useful if a PC logically ought to pay attention to this > option, but isn't.) What about making PCSetUseAmat() use PetscTryMethod() > and move the check of "-pc_use_amat" into each implementation? > > > I agree with Barry that it should be high level and make it there for any > PC to use if they want. > > Do we really want to leave the confusing option in place for all the PCs > that don't have inner solvers? > > > It just doesn't seem that bad to me. > Okay, okay, I'll stick with the simple thing. What about "-pc_reuse"? It is only referenced in src/ksp/pc/impls/factor/lu/lu.c and it doesn't have an API. Can it be removed entirely? I thought we were using SAME_PRECONDITIONER for this sort of thing. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20130323/d2a45351/attachment.html>
