Satish Balay <[email protected]> writes:

> Jed,
>
> The sowing update is primarily required by
> knepley/feature-plex-generic-distribute Hower I branched
> 'balay/update-sowing' off master - and merged to next.
>
> Should I have directly commited to
> knepley/feature-plex-generic-distribute?
>
> Should I now merge balay/update-sowing into
> knepley/feature-plex-generic-distribute?
>
> There is one more fix required here: add MPI_Type_f2c() to mpiuni. And
> this is dependent on knepley/feature-plex-generic-distribute +
> balay/update-sowing
>
> Trying to figure out where to commit this..
>
> perhaps merge [or rebase] balay/update-sowing to
> knepley/feature-plex-generic-distribute - and the commit directly to
> knepley/feature-plex-generic-distribute?

Add the MPIUNI support to 'balay/update-sowing', then merge it into
'knepley/feature-plex-generic-distribute'.  Don't rebase because we
already have one copy of that commit in 'next'.

'balay/update-sowing' makes sense without
'knepley/feature-plex-generic-distribute' so it was right to make it its
own branch.

Attachment: pgptcO1azbBBF.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to