On Thu, 12 Sep 2013, Jed Brown wrote: > Satish Balay <[email protected]> writes: > > > Jed, > > > > The sowing update is primarily required by > > knepley/feature-plex-generic-distribute Hower I branched > > 'balay/update-sowing' off master - and merged to next. > > > > Should I have directly commited to > > knepley/feature-plex-generic-distribute? > > > > Should I now merge balay/update-sowing into > > knepley/feature-plex-generic-distribute? > > > > There is one more fix required here: add MPI_Type_f2c() to mpiuni. And > > this is dependent on knepley/feature-plex-generic-distribute + > > balay/update-sowing > > > > Trying to figure out where to commit this.. > > > > perhaps merge [or rebase] balay/update-sowing to > > knepley/feature-plex-generic-distribute - and the commit directly to > > knepley/feature-plex-generic-distribute? > > Add the MPIUNI support to 'balay/update-sowing', then merge it into > 'knepley/feature-plex-generic-distribute'. Don't rebase because we > already have one copy of that commit in 'next'. > > 'balay/update-sowing' makes sense without > 'knepley/feature-plex-generic-distribute' so it was right to make it its > own branch.
thanks. added to balay/update-sowing - and merged to knepley/feature-plex-generic-distribute and then merged knepley/feature-plex-generic-distribute to next. Satish
