Lisandro Dalcin <[email protected]> writes: > On 4 November 2013 16:44, Jed Brown <[email protected]> wrote: >> Looks like you pasted into gmail, ruining the formatting. > > My intention was to show what I was talking about, not to submit a > patch. It does not render so bad in my gmail.
You can see the messed-up line breaks here: http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/2013-November/013717.html >> I like >> running it per library rather than as a separate step. > > OK, I'll push this change to master. > > PS: Do you have any intention to continue supporting CMake builds? We > could do something similar for this case. The way I see it, it's CMake's job to offer something sane when building on Apple. If they are not doing something reasonable, talk to Apple or Kitware. If we _must_ work around those problems, we can do it. I think that in v3.5, the CMake build will probably only be used by those people that want to edit PETSc source in an IDE that uses CMake-generated project files.
pgpnty_UlnMKy.pgp
Description: PGP signature
