On Thu, 2 Oct 2014, Jed Brown wrote: > Satish Balay <[email protected]> writes: > > I think is ok to be a bit more messy in next. Sure there is a tradeoff > > - but you get better debugging in master :) > > If bugs make it to 'master', the process has failed.
If we have to do patch releases - the process has failed? Satish > The purpose of 'next' is quality control. We only care about the > history in 'next' so long as it makes that job easier/more reliable.
