Satish Balay <[email protected]> writes: > On Thu, 2 Oct 2014, Jed Brown wrote: > >> Satish Balay <[email protected]> writes: >> > I think is ok to be a bit more messy in next. Sure there is a tradeoff >> > - but you get better debugging in master :) >> >> If bugs make it to 'master', the process has failed. > > If we have to do patch releases - the process has failed?
Of course. Every bug is a failure of internal quality control. It's not possible to avoid bugs entirely, but we should strive to catch them early. I.e., saying that we won't worry about bugs in 'next' because we can fix them in 'master' defeats the purpose of the workflow.
pgpLEYlqLiNas.pgp
Description: PGP signature
