Is it intended for endusers -> petschash.h (requires decent documentation and error checking) or for use by PETSc -> petsc-private/hashimpl.h
> On Feb 19, 2015, at 3:47 PM, Matthew Knepley <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 2:39 PM, Jed Brown <[email protected]> wrote: > Matthew Knepley <[email protected]> writes: > > > On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 1:42 AM, Lisandro Dalcin <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Please take look to the last line of the following output: > >> > >> $ grep include $PETSC_DIR/include/petsc-private/dmpleximpl.h > >> #include <petscmat.h> /*I "petscmat.h" I*/ > >> #include <petscdmplex.h> /*I "petscdmplex.h" I*/ > >> #include <petscbt.h> > >> #include <petscsf.h> > >> #include <petsc-private/dmimpl.h> > >> #include <../src/sys/utils/hash.h> > >> > > > > It does not look like anything else uses hash.h. Can we just move it to > > include/petschash.h? > > Why does it need to be included by a header? > > I thought something else was using this, but it looks like I am the only one. > We > should put it in a header and clear out the cruft no one uses anymore: > > knepley/feature-harmonic-advection *$:/PETSc3/petsc/petsc-dev$ find ./src > -type f | xargs grep hash.h > find ./src -type f | xargs grep hash.h > ./src/dm/impls/plex/plexinterpolate.c:#include <../src/sys/utils/hash.h> > ./src/dm/impls/plex/plexinterpolate.c~:#include <../src/sys/utils/hash.h> > ./src/dm/impls/plex/plextree.c:#include <../src/sys/utils/hash.h> > ./src/sys/examples/tests/ex26.c:#include <../src/sys/utils/hash.h> > ./src/sys/utils/hash.h:#include <khash.h> > 1knepley/feature-harmonic-advection *$:/PETSc3/petsc/petsc-dev$ find > ./include -type f | xargs grep hash.h > find ./include -type f | xargs grep hash.h > ./include/petsc-private/dmpleximpl.h:#include <../src/sys/utils/hash.h> > > Matt > > -- > What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments > is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments > lead. > -- Norbert Wiener
