Matthew Knepley <[email protected]> writes:

> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 2:39 PM, Jed Brown <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Matthew Knepley <[email protected]> writes:
>> > It does not look like anything else uses hash.h. Can we just move it to
>> > include/petschash.h?
>>
>> Why does it need to be included by a header?
>>
>
> I thought something else was using this, but it looks like I am the
> only one. We should put it in a header and clear out the cruft no one
> uses anymore:

I was asking why you include it from dmpleximpl.h.  Can you remove that
and just include it from the necessary source files?  I'm fine with
petsc-private/hashimpl.h, and of course remove the cruft.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to