On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 9:43 AM, Jed Brown <[email protected]> wrote:

> Matthew Knepley <[email protected]> writes:
> > I think you need an if () to make the compiler quit whining.
>
> if what?  if (1)?  Seems pointless.
>

if (!link) SETERRQ();

The compiler will not be able to reason about that and the cannot know that
the return is not reached.

  Matt

-- 
What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
experiments lead.
-- Norbert Wiener

Reply via email to