Matthew Knepley <[email protected]> writes:

> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 9:43 AM, Jed Brown <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Matthew Knepley <[email protected]> writes:
>> > I think you need an if () to make the compiler quit whining.
>>
>> if what?  if (1)?  Seems pointless.
>>
>
> if (!link) SETERRQ();
>
> The compiler will not be able to reason about that and the cannot know that
> the return is not reached.

That is the exit condition of the preceding loop, so it would be a bug
in the compiler's reachability analysis if it did not do that analysis.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to