This would also be a benefit in that it would increase the information density of the examples that define __FUNCT__ , specifically all the TAO examples.
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Jed Brown <[email protected]> wrote: > "Stowell, Mark L." <[email protected]> writes: > > This leads to numerous error messages of the form > > > > .../petsc-3.6.0/src/dm/impls/da/dageometry.c:643: > __FUNCT__="DMDACnvertToCell" does not agree with > __func__="DMDAConvertToCell" > > Both C99 and C++11 defines __func__ (and most pre-C++11 compilers define > __func__ and/or __FUNCTION__). Shall we consider deleting 22328 lines > of PETSc by just using those (perhaps with a fallback to a less useful > stack trace)? >
