Will we lose all stack information on Windows? That is does the Intel Windows compiler do it right? Does the Microsoft compiler (post 2010) do it right? If it is verified that things work ok on Windows then yes it is time to remove them all.
Barry > On Jun 16, 2015, at 2:57 PM, Patrick Sanan <[email protected]> wrote: > > This would also be a benefit in that it would increase the information > density of the examples that define __FUNCT__ , specifically all the TAO > examples. > > On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Jed Brown <[email protected]> wrote: > "Stowell, Mark L." <[email protected]> writes: > > This leads to numerous error messages of the form > > > > .../petsc-3.6.0/src/dm/impls/da/dageometry.c:643: > > __FUNCT__="DMDACnvertToCell" does not agree with > > __func__="DMDAConvertToCell" > > Both C99 and C++11 defines __func__ (and most pre-C++11 compilers define > __func__ and/or __FUNCTION__). Shall we consider deleting 22328 lines > of PETSc by just using those (perhaps with a fallback to a less useful > stack trace)? >
