On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 4:52 PM, Barry Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Aug 27, 2015, at 4:38 PM, Mark Adams <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > OK, I can put PetscRandom back into GAMG and add a check for DIVERGE_ITS > in the Cheby solve. Is that necessary and sufficient? > > Branch? https://bitbucket.org/petsc/petsc/branch/knepley/feature-drand48-portable Matt > > > > Mark > > > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 4:25 PM, Matthew Knepley <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 2:17 PM, Barry Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > On Aug 27, 2015, at 2:15 PM, Jed Brown <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Barry Smith <[email protected]> writes: > > >> Don't use drand48 directly; use PetscRandom. Matt promised to fix > up PetscRandom to use it by default and work on all systems so all you need > to do is use PetscRandom everywhere. > > > > > > Yes, that's what I meant. But we need a deterministic seed. > > > > Matt promised > > > > Its in 'next', > > > > -random_type rander48 > > > > Matt > > > > -- > > What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their > experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their > experiments lead. > > -- Norbert Wiener > > > > -- What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments lead. -- Norbert Wiener
