On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 2:11 PM, Jed Brown <[email protected]> wrote:
> Barry Smith <[email protected]> writes: > > Sounds like Jed is saying he is ok with making the default use the > > random number generator. Do this in a branch and be aware that you > > have to update a bunch of the test output files to match the new > > convergence histories introduced by the change. > > Sure, but if it's all the same to you all, let's use a hash. This guy > seems to have a convenient permutation of 32-bit integers. (Overkill > for us, but that's not a problem.) > > http://stackoverflow.com/a/12996028/33208 > > Use i=(i >> 32)^i for 64-bit input. > Should we just make this another Random implementation which is only for testing? Matt -- What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments lead. -- Norbert Wiener
