> On Aug 10, 2016, at 2:52 PM, Ari Rappaport <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi Mark,
> There was indeed a bug on our end. Now that we fixed it everything is working 
> correctly even in parallel. I have one question still though. Is there a way 
> to get the mg_levels_pc_type jacobi option
> set in the code without passing it as an argument to PetscInitialize? I'm 
> using PCGAMGSetType(pc, PCJACOBI) but it doesn't seem to be working.

   You can call PetscOptionsSetValue("-<appropriate 
prefix>_mg_levels_pc_type","jacobi") in the code anywhere before your code 
creates the SNES or KSP object you are using. This is equivalent to putting it 
on the command line.

  Barry

> 
> 
> -Ari
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mark Adams" <[email protected]>
> To: "Ari Rappaport" <[email protected]>
> Cc: "For users of the development version of PETSc" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2016 7:24:24 PM
> Subject: Re: [petsc-dev] Algebraic Multigrid
> 
> There is clearly something very wrong with your code. I would suggest 
> starting with an example code for instance KSP/examples/tutorial/ex56.c and 
> incrementally add your operator to get something that is working. 
> 
> 
> Also if you have multiple degrees of freedom per vertex, for instance 
> elasticity, then you want to set the block size of the matrix accordingly. 
> 
> On Wednesday, July 27, 2016, Ari Rappaport < [email protected] > wrote: 
> 
> 
> Hi Mark, 
> We added the Jacobi line and it appears to accept that flag now. However, we 
> are getting all zeros for the solution vector. And PETSc is claiming to have 
> converged in 7 iterations to the relative tolerance. 
> 
> -Ari 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Mark Adams" < [email protected] > 
> To: "Ari Rappaport" < [email protected] >, "For users of the development 
> version of PETSc" < [email protected] > 
> Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2016 3:26:03 PM 
> Subject: Re: [petsc-dev] Algebraic Multigrid 
> 
> 
> Please keep this on the Petsc list. 
> 
> We seem to have lost Jacobi smoother again. I'm suspecting that you're some 
> funny character in your line with Jacobi that is Confusing the parser. Get 
> back to the old file with the two two Jacobi entries and delete the other 
> line and get Jacobi in the KSP view output. There should be no SOR in the 
> output. 
> 
> 
> On Wednesday, July 27, 2016, Ari Rappaport < [email protected] > wrote: 
> 
> 
> Hi Mark, 
> I added all these new things. The PCAMG is now ending very quickly but the 
> residual is unreasonably large by about 10 orders of magnitude. I noticed the 
> line "Linear solve did not converge due to DIVERGED_INDEFINITE_PC iterations 
> 2" in the output, could this be causing the problem? It only appears to be 
> going for 2 iterations now. 
> 
> -Ari 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Mark Adams" < [email protected] > 
> To: "Ari Rappaport" < [email protected] > 
> Cc: "For users of the development version of PETSc" < [email protected] > 
> Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2016 5:07:34 PM 
> Subject: Re: [petsc-dev] Algebraic Multigrid 
> 
> 
> Ari, I would also check that your operator is not messed up in parallel. The 
> solver is looking pretty solid. 
> 
> 
> Also, you can configure PETSc with hypre and use '-pc_type hypre'. If hypre 
> is also good in serial but hosed on multi-proc then it is most probably your 
> operator. 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 6:58 PM, Mark Adams < [email protected] > wrote: 
> 
> 
> 
> So remove one of the -mg_levels_pc_type jacobi and add -mg_coarse_ksp_type 
> preonly, then verify that this works on one proc and then try two procs. 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 6:56 PM, Mark Adams < [email protected] > wrote: 
> 
> 
> 
> Oh, actually this worked. You have this ...pc_type jacobi in there twice, so 
> one of them was "unused". 
> 
> 
> Try this with 2 processors now. 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 6:42 PM, Mark Adams < [email protected] > wrote: 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 6:24 PM, Ari Rappaport < [email protected] > wrote: 
> 
> 
> So I commented out the line PCSetType(pc, PCGAMG). The line 
> KSPSetFromOptions(ksp) was already in the code at the end of our 
> initialization routine. I also added .petscrc to the working dir. Here is the 
> current output. It seems as if Option left: name:-mg_levels_pc_type jacobi 
> (no value) is still present in the output..I dunno. 
> 
> 
> 
> Yea, I dunno either. If you use -help you will get printout of the available 
> options. If you do this you will see stuff like -mg_levels_1_ ... you can 
> also see this in the ksp_view. There is a shortcut that lets you _not_ put 
> "_1" in. Try putting this in for each level like so: 
> 
> 
> 
> -mg_levels_1_pc_type jacobi 
> 
> -mg_levels_2_pc_type jacobi 
> -mg_levels_3_pc_type jacobi 
> 
> 
> 
> I also notice that the coarse grid ksp is GMRES. This is our fault. It should 
> be preonly. Add: 
> 
> 
> -mg_coarse_ksp_type preonly 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -Ari 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Mark Adams" < [email protected] > 
> To: "Ari Rappaport" < [email protected] >, "For users of the development 
> version of PETSc" < [email protected] > 
> Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2016 4:03:03 PM 
> Subject: Re: [petsc-dev] Algebraic Multigrid 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> At the end of this you have: 
> 
> 
> 
> #PETSc Option Table entries: 
> -ksp_view 
> -mg_levels_pc_type jacobi 
> -options_left 
> #End of PETSc Option Table entries 
> There is one unused database option. It is: 
> Option left: name:-mg_levels_pc_type jacobi (no value) 
> 
> 
> So this jacobi parameter is not being used. 
> 
> 
> Do you call KPSSetFromOptions? Do you set solver parameters in the code? Like 
> PCGAMG? 
> 
> 
> You should not set anything in the code, it just confuses things at this 
> point. Use KSPSetFromOptions(). You can hardwire stuff before this call, this 
> just lets you set the defaults, but you should always call this last to let 
> command line parameters override the defaults. 
> 
> 
> You can put this in a .petscrc file in the working directory and try again. 
> 
> 
> 
> -ksp_type cg 
> -ksp_max_it 50 
> 
> -ksp_rtol 1.e-6 
> -ksp_converged_reason 
> -pc_type gamg 
> -pc_gamg_type agg 
> -pc_gamg_agg_nsmooths 1 
> -pc_gamg_coarse_eq_limit 10 
> -pc_gamg_reuse_interpolation true 
> -pc_gamg_square_graph 1 
> -pc_gamg_threshold -0.05 
> -mg_levels_ksp_max_it 2 
> -mg_levels_ksp_type chebyshev 
> -mg_levels_esteig_ksp_type cg 
> -mg_levels_esteig_ksp_max_it 10 
> -mg_levels_ksp_chebyshev_esteig 0,.05,0,1.05 
> -mg_levels_pc_type jacobi 
> -pc_hypre_type boomeramg 
> -pc_hypre_boomeramg_no_CF 
> -pc_hypre_boomeramg_agg_nl 1 
> -pc_hypre_boomeramg_coarsen_type HMIS 
> -pc_hypre_boomeramg_interp_type ext+i 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to