>> /home/mantis/petsc/petsc-3.6.4/linux-gnu/externalpackages/hypre-2.10.0b-p4/src/utilities/exchange_data.c:205: undefined reference to `ceil' <<
Try adding configure flag: LIBS=-lm BTW: >>>>>>> Working directory: /home/mantis/petsc/petsc-3.6.4 Executing: mpicc -show stdout: gcc -fPIC -g3 -I/home/mantis/petsc/petsc-3.7.2/linux-gnu/include -L/home/mantis/petsc/petsc-3.7.2/linux-gnu/lib -Wl,-rpath -Wl,/home/mantis/petsc/petsc-3.7.2/linux-gnu/lib -Wl,--enable-new-dtags -lmpi <<<<<<< Mixing petsc versions might cause issues.. Satish On Tue, 16 Aug 2016, Ari Rappaport wrote: > Hi Barry, > Sorry for the late reply. Here is my configure.log file. I am assuming you > meant the configure.log in the petsc-3.6.4 home directory. > > -Ari > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Barry Smith" <[email protected]> > To: "Ari Rappaport" <[email protected]> > Cc: "Mark Adams" <[email protected]>, "For users of the development version of > PETSc" <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2016 3:59:47 PM > Subject: Re: [petsc-dev] Algebraic Multigrid > > > > On Aug 11, 2016, at 4:42 PM, Ari Rappaport <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi Guys, > > So the algebraic multigrid works great for a Poisson equation. However, > > it's choking on our Maxwell's Equations solver which is a form of curl/curl > > if I'm not mistaken. > > Maxwell's equations are tricky for multigrid. hypre has a solver specific > for Maxwell's equation, you need to check it out; note this is not just > running with hypre boomerAMG. If you run boomerAMG directly with Maxwell's > you will not get satisfactory results. > > > I was going to give hypre AMS a try, but I'm having trouble installing it. > > I'm getting the error "Downloaded hypre could not be used". > > Send configure.log > > > > I'm using Ubuntu 14.04 if that makes a difference. Also, is non-algebraic > > multigrid a reasonable choice for Maxwell's Equations? > > Even with geometric multigrid Maxwell's equations are nontrivial; you will > need to do some literature search to determine how to handle the > restriction/interpolation and smoothing to work well for Maxwell. > > Barry > > > > > Thanks, > > Ari > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Barry Smith" <[email protected]> > > To: "Ari Rappaport" <[email protected]> > > Cc: "Mark Adams" <[email protected]>, "For users of the development version > > of PETSc" <[email protected]> > > Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2016 2:02:10 PM > > Subject: Re: [petsc-dev] Algebraic Multigrid > > > > > >> On Aug 10, 2016, at 2:52 PM, Ari Rappaport <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> Hi Mark, > >> There was indeed a bug on our end. Now that we fixed it everything is > >> working correctly even in parallel. I have one question still though. Is > >> there a way to get the mg_levels_pc_type jacobi option > >> set in the code without passing it as an argument to PetscInitialize? I'm > >> using PCGAMGSetType(pc, PCJACOBI) but it doesn't seem to be working. > > > > You can call PetscOptionsSetValue("-<appropriate > > prefix>_mg_levels_pc_type","jacobi") in the code anywhere before your code > > creates the SNES or KSP object you are using. This is equivalent to putting > > it on the command line. > > > > Barry > > > >> > >> > >> -Ari > >> > >> ----- Original Message ----- > >> From: "Mark Adams" <[email protected]> > >> To: "Ari Rappaport" <[email protected]> > >> Cc: "For users of the development version of PETSc" <[email protected]> > >> Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2016 7:24:24 PM > >> Subject: Re: [petsc-dev] Algebraic Multigrid > >> > >> There is clearly something very wrong with your code. I would suggest > >> starting with an example code for instance KSP/examples/tutorial/ex56.c > >> and incrementally add your operator to get something that is working. > >> > >> > >> Also if you have multiple degrees of freedom per vertex, for instance > >> elasticity, then you want to set the block size of the matrix accordingly. > >> > >> On Wednesday, July 27, 2016, Ari Rappaport < [email protected] > wrote: > >> > >> > >> Hi Mark, > >> We added the Jacobi line and it appears to accept that flag now. However, > >> we are getting all zeros for the solution vector. And PETSc is claiming to > >> have converged in 7 iterations to the relative tolerance. > >> > >> -Ari > >> > >> ----- Original Message ----- > >> From: "Mark Adams" < [email protected] > > >> To: "Ari Rappaport" < [email protected] >, "For users of the development > >> version of PETSc" < [email protected] > > >> Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2016 3:26:03 PM > >> Subject: Re: [petsc-dev] Algebraic Multigrid > >> > >> > >> Please keep this on the Petsc list. > >> > >> We seem to have lost Jacobi smoother again. I'm suspecting that you're > >> some funny character in your line with Jacobi that is Confusing the > >> parser. Get back to the old file with the two two Jacobi entries and > >> delete the other line and get Jacobi in the KSP view output. There should > >> be no SOR in the output. > >> > >> > >> On Wednesday, July 27, 2016, Ari Rappaport < [email protected] > wrote: > >> > >> > >> Hi Mark, > >> I added all these new things. The PCAMG is now ending very quickly but the > >> residual is unreasonably large by about 10 orders of magnitude. I noticed > >> the line "Linear solve did not converge due to DIVERGED_INDEFINITE_PC > >> iterations 2" in the output, could this be causing the problem? It only > >> appears to be going for 2 iterations now. > >> > >> -Ari > >> > >> ----- Original Message ----- > >> From: "Mark Adams" < [email protected] > > >> To: "Ari Rappaport" < [email protected] > > >> Cc: "For users of the development version of PETSc" < > >> [email protected] > > >> Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2016 5:07:34 PM > >> Subject: Re: [petsc-dev] Algebraic Multigrid > >> > >> > >> Ari, I would also check that your operator is not messed up in parallel. > >> The solver is looking pretty solid. > >> > >> > >> Also, you can configure PETSc with hypre and use '-pc_type hypre'. If > >> hypre is also good in serial but hosed on multi-proc then it is most > >> probably your operator. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 6:58 PM, Mark Adams < [email protected] > wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> So remove one of the -mg_levels_pc_type jacobi and add -mg_coarse_ksp_type > >> preonly, then verify that this works on one proc and then try two procs. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 6:56 PM, Mark Adams < [email protected] > wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> Oh, actually this worked. You have this ...pc_type jacobi in there twice, > >> so one of them was "unused". > >> > >> > >> Try this with 2 processors now. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 6:42 PM, Mark Adams < [email protected] > wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 6:24 PM, Ari Rappaport < [email protected] > wrote: > >> > >> > >> So I commented out the line PCSetType(pc, PCGAMG). The line > >> KSPSetFromOptions(ksp) was already in the code at the end of our > >> initialization routine. I also added .petscrc to the working dir. Here is > >> the current output. It seems as if Option left: name:-mg_levels_pc_type > >> jacobi (no value) is still present in the output..I dunno. > >> > >> > >> > >> Yea, I dunno either. If you use -help you will get printout of the > >> available options. If you do this you will see stuff like -mg_levels_1_ > >> ... you can also see this in the ksp_view. There is a shortcut that lets > >> you _not_ put "_1" in. Try putting this in for each level like so: > >> > >> > >> > >> -mg_levels_1_pc_type jacobi > >> > >> -mg_levels_2_pc_type jacobi > >> -mg_levels_3_pc_type jacobi > >> > >> > >> > >> I also notice that the coarse grid ksp is GMRES. This is our fault. It > >> should be preonly. Add: > >> > >> > >> -mg_coarse_ksp_type preonly > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> -Ari > >> > >> ----- Original Message ----- > >> From: "Mark Adams" < [email protected] > > >> To: "Ari Rappaport" < [email protected] >, "For users of the development > >> version of PETSc" < [email protected] > > >> Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2016 4:03:03 PM > >> Subject: Re: [petsc-dev] Algebraic Multigrid > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> At the end of this you have: > >> > >> > >> > >> #PETSc Option Table entries: > >> -ksp_view > >> -mg_levels_pc_type jacobi > >> -options_left > >> #End of PETSc Option Table entries > >> There is one unused database option. It is: > >> Option left: name:-mg_levels_pc_type jacobi (no value) > >> > >> > >> So this jacobi parameter is not being used. > >> > >> > >> Do you call KPSSetFromOptions? Do you set solver parameters in the code? > >> Like PCGAMG? > >> > >> > >> You should not set anything in the code, it just confuses things at this > >> point. Use KSPSetFromOptions(). You can hardwire stuff before this call, > >> this just lets you set the defaults, but you should always call this last > >> to let command line parameters override the defaults. > >> > >> > >> You can put this in a .petscrc file in the working directory and try > >> again. > >> > >> > >> > >> -ksp_type cg > >> -ksp_max_it 50 > >> > >> -ksp_rtol 1.e-6 > >> -ksp_converged_reason > >> -pc_type gamg > >> -pc_gamg_type agg > >> -pc_gamg_agg_nsmooths 1 > >> -pc_gamg_coarse_eq_limit 10 > >> -pc_gamg_reuse_interpolation true > >> -pc_gamg_square_graph 1 > >> -pc_gamg_threshold -0.05 > >> -mg_levels_ksp_max_it 2 > >> -mg_levels_ksp_type chebyshev > >> -mg_levels_esteig_ksp_type cg > >> -mg_levels_esteig_ksp_max_it 10 > >> -mg_levels_ksp_chebyshev_esteig 0,.05,0,1.05 > >> -mg_levels_pc_type jacobi > >> -pc_hypre_type boomeramg > >> -pc_hypre_boomeramg_no_CF > >> -pc_hypre_boomeramg_agg_nl 1 > >> -pc_hypre_boomeramg_coarsen_type HMIS > >> -pc_hypre_boomeramg_interp_type ext+i > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > >
