On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 2:18 PM, Barry Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Dec 3, 2016, at 11:58 AM, Matthew Knepley <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Right now, TS just leaves the equation type as undetermined, and never > queries it except for the IMEX methods. This seems really strange to me. If > we choose a linear TS solver, shouldn't it set the type to LINEAR, and > likewise for nonlinear? Then a user could query this for information. We > want to do just that in PyLith. > > Is your concern that many of the examples never bother to set the type? Yes, since I want to query this to see what formulation the user expects. > Or that not enough error checking is done that the set type works with > solution method selected by the user? No > I think these are just oversights and you should go ahead and add these in > the examples and code where appropriate. Will do. Matt > > Barry > > > > > Matt > > > > -- > > What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their > experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their > experiments lead. > > -- Norbert Wiener > > -- What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments lead. -- Norbert Wiener
