--with-batch=0 seems to fix the problem. On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 4:40 AM, Mark Adams <[email protected]> wrote:
> BTW, I cloned this (working) config file and changed to single precision > and 32 bit ints, and added with-batch=1. > > On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 11:20 PM, Satish Balay <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I can reproduce this issue. [we don't notice it normally because >> default system blas is usually found - so there is no error..] >> >> Satish >> >> On Wed, 28 Dec 2016, Barry Smith wrote: >> >> > >> > Mark, >> > >> > Yes this is odd. You clearly have --download-fblaslapack=1 but then >> in the file it has >> > >> > TEST alternateConfigureLibrary from config.packages.fblaslapack(/g >> lobal/u2/m/madams/petsc/config/BuildSystem/config/package.py:761) >> > TESTING: alternateConfigureLibrary from config.packages.fblaslapack(co >> nfig/BuildSystem/config/package.py:761) >> > Called if --with-packagename=0; does nothing by default >> > >> > I suggest try removing all options except the >> --download-fblaslapack=1 and the compiler names and the --with-batch and >> see if it goes through. Do not cut and past but type each argument; it >> could be some strange character being pass in you cannot see. >> > >> > Barry >> > >> > >> > > On Dec 28, 2016, at 9:52 PM, Mark Adams <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > >> > > I am getting an error about blas-lapack, suggesting that I download >> it, but I seem to be asking to download it. Not sure what the problem is ... >> > > >> > > <configure.log> >> > >> > >> >> >
