> On Dec 29, 2016, at 10:03 AM, Satish Balay <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I suspect blaslpack along with mpi cannot be installed in batch mode anymore.
This is nuts! It should be able to build blaslapack. And it certainly
shouldn't just chug along without a big error message instead of pretending the
option was not set.
Presumably batchBodies is only set before the reconfigure?
So here it skips the download before, that is ok,
def checkDownload(self):
'''Check if we should download the package, returning the install directory
or the empty string indicating installation'''
if not self.download:
return ''
if self.framework.batchBodies:
return
Here it skips configure, and if this is only the first time it is ok
def configure(self):
if self.download and self.argDB['download-'+self.downloadname.lower()] and
not self.framework.batchBodies:
self.argDB['with-'+self.package] = 1
These are the only two mentions of batch in package.py so maybe batchBodies
is always set? Then we need a different way
to know if it is before or after the reconfigure.
Barry
>
> [at some point all pacakges were installed before reconfigure. And I think
> this was
> switched to - install packages during reconfigure. Ideally there should be
> proper
> dependencies on the 'batch' part - so that only packages that require info
> from the
> batch run should get installed during reconfigure stage..]
>
> BTW: Why use --download-fblaslapack on cray? [and not system blas - like
> cray-libsci]
>
> Satish
>
> On Thu, 29 Dec 2016, Mark Adams wrote:
>
>> --with-batch=0 seems to fix the problem.
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 4:40 AM, Mark Adams <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> BTW, I cloned this (working) config file and changed to single precision
>>> and 32 bit ints, and added with-batch=1.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 11:20 PM, Satish Balay <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I can reproduce this issue. [we don't notice it normally because
>>>> default system blas is usually found - so there is no error..]
>>>>
>>>> Satish
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, 28 Dec 2016, Barry Smith wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Mark,
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes this is odd. You clearly have --download-fblaslapack=1 but then
>>>> in the file it has
>>>>>
>>>>> TEST alternateConfigureLibrary from config.packages.fblaslapack(/g
>>>> lobal/u2/m/madams/petsc/config/BuildSystem/config/package.py:761)
>>>>> TESTING: alternateConfigureLibrary from config.packages.fblaslapack(co
>>>> nfig/BuildSystem/config/package.py:761)
>>>>> Called if --with-packagename=0; does nothing by default
>>>>>
>>>>> I suggest try removing all options except the
>>>> --download-fblaslapack=1 and the compiler names and the --with-batch and
>>>> see if it goes through. Do not cut and past but type each argument; it
>>>> could be some strange character being pass in you cannot see.
>>>>>
>>>>> Barry
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Dec 28, 2016, at 9:52 PM, Mark Adams <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am getting an error about blas-lapack, suggesting that I download
>>>> it, but I seem to be asking to download it. Not sure what the problem is
>>>> ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <configure.log>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
