My estimate of "a few days" ended up being off (discovered many problems when running the test suite with it using SeqAIJMKL as the AIJ subtype), but I think my initial AIJMKL class is now close to completion and have submitted a pull request.
--Richard On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 12:42 PM, Karl Rupp <r...@iue.tuwien.ac.at> wrote: > Hi folks, > > alright, let me summarize and organize things. If you're on the list, > please provide or update information on 'what left' and 'expected > completion': > > * SF support for MPIUNI > - Who: Jed > - What left: Implementation > - Expected completion: ? > > * Hashtable support for matrix assembly > - Who: Jed > - What left: ? > - Expected completion: ? > > * New GLVis based viewer for DMDAs, FEM an FVM > - Who: Stefano > - What left: Test & merge > - Expected completion: in a few days > > * Tools for particle-in-cell methods > - Who: Dave > - What left: ? > - Expected completion: ? > > * AIJMKL submatrix type > - Who: Richard > - What left: Cleanup, test & merge > - Expected completion: a few days > > * Manual chapter: Performance Hints > - Who: Karli > - What left: More writing > - Expected completion: this week > > I thought about using the issue tracker for this, but without support > for proper tagging or milestones the issue tracker on Bitbucket is of > very limited use. > > Best regards, > Karli > > > On 07/23/2017 05:08 PM, Barry Smith wrote: > > > > Anything stopping us from making a PETSc release? > > > > Barry > > >
