Thanks. I'm just a simple caveman academic: your private sector research frightens and confuses me!
On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 09:32:29PM -0500, Barry Smith wrote: > > Heck we have repos of things with far more stringent silly licenses :-) > > Barry > > > On Sep 5, 2017, at 7:45 PM, Karl Rupp <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi Toby, > > > > FYI: the Random123 license is just what is commonly referred to as the > > 2-clause BSD license: > > https://opensource.org/licenses/BSD-2-Clause > > I don't see any problem with making a repo for it and using it for a > > PetscRandom implementation (IANAL). > > > > Best regards, > > Karli > > > > > > > > On 09/05/2017 06:26 PM, Tobin Isaac wrote: > >> I just came across Random123 [1]: portable, parallel, high-quality > >> pseudorandom number generators. It's developed by DE Shaw, but the > >> license [2] looks to me like we should be able to make a repo for it and > >> use it as a PetscRandom implementation. Does anyone savvier than me want > >> to look at the license and see if I'm missing something? > >> Cheers, > >> Toby > >> [1]: https://doi.org/10.1145/2063384.2063405 > >> [2]: > >> http://www.deshawresearch.com/downloads/download_random123.cgi/Random123_License.txt >
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
