It is the 3-clause BSD license, with the third clause formatted in a funny way.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BSD_licenses#3-clause_license_.28.22BSD_License_2.0.22.2C_.22Revised_BSD_License.22.2C_.22New_BSD_License.22.2C_or_.22Modified_BSD_License.22.29 Tobin Isaac <[email protected]> writes: > Thanks. I'm just a simple caveman academic: your private sector > research frightens and confuses me! > > > On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 09:32:29PM -0500, Barry Smith wrote: >> >> Heck we have repos of things with far more stringent silly licenses :-) >> >> Barry >> >> > On Sep 5, 2017, at 7:45 PM, Karl Rupp <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > Hi Toby, >> > >> > FYI: the Random123 license is just what is commonly referred to as the >> > 2-clause BSD license: >> > https://opensource.org/licenses/BSD-2-Clause >> > I don't see any problem with making a repo for it and using it for a >> > PetscRandom implementation (IANAL). >> > >> > Best regards, >> > Karli >> > >> > >> > >> > On 09/05/2017 06:26 PM, Tobin Isaac wrote: >> >> I just came across Random123 [1]: portable, parallel, high-quality >> >> pseudorandom number generators. It's developed by DE Shaw, but the >> >> license [2] looks to me like we should be able to make a repo for it and >> >> use it as a PetscRandom implementation. Does anyone savvier than me want >> >> to look at the license and see if I'm missing something? >> >> Cheers, >> >> Toby >> >> [1]: https://doi.org/10.1145/2063384.2063405 >> >> [2]: >> >> http://www.deshawresearch.com/downloads/download_random123.cgi/Random123_License.txt >>
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
