"Smith, Barry F." <[email protected]> writes: >> On Mar 21, 2018, at 7:41 PM, Jed Brown <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Satish Balay <[email protected]> writes: >> >>> On Thu, 22 Mar 2018, Satish Balay wrote: >>> >>>>> make gnumake VERBOSE=1 does not show how the library is built, how does >>>>> one see what exactly is being passed to build the library? Impossible for >>>>> me to debug. >>> >>> BTW: This is: >>> >>> make V=1 >> >> Barry, see other thread about whether to use >> >> -install_name @rpath/libpetsc.so.3.08 >> >> versus the absolute path. Using @rpath makes the library relocatable >> without changing it (like on Linux), but requires either linking with >> RPATH (-Wl,-rpath,/prefix/lib) or DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH (like on Linux). >> What is your preference? > > I prefer the absolute path. > >> >>>>> This was all fine in the past for prefix builds on the Mac all the recent >>>>> messing around broke it. > > Is there a branch that fixes the problem or has the problem just been > commented on for a few days?
Should be fixed now in 'next' and 'jed/gmakefile-paths'. >>> >>> BTW: The changes didn't affect saws. It has its own installer that needs >>> fixing? >> >> Yeah, pretty sure Saws issues are unrelated. > > I'm not convinced.
