> On Apr 21, 2018, at 6:38 PM, Balay, Satish <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 21 Apr 2018, Václav Hapla wrote:
>
>> Sorry Barry, that's my fault.
>>
>> Thanks a lot Satish for the quick fix with !trilinos. Hope it works now.
>>
>> I think the chaco partitioner should be definitely replaced by simple it
>> these tests as Matt suggested. But I will rather push it within a separate
>> PR since it extends the tested archs (by removing chaco and !trilinos
>> requirements) so some previously unseen issues might appear theoretically.
>
> Yes - any changes should be a new PR.
>
> It would be good to figure out exactly where the difference comes form
> [wrt chaco from trilinos vs separate install of chaco - or some other
> interaction from trilinos]
Different random numbers being generated?
>
> and we could keep chaco tests - and tailor them appropriately with
> '!trilinos' or have multipe outout file [i.e _alt.out format] for
> chaco tests - if thats appropriate.
If both sets are correct than an _alt file is better than !trilinos in the
long run.
Barry
>
> Satish
