I can confirm --download-chaco vs --download-trilinos give different chaco 
partitioning - I can reproduce on my machine. So I made some investigation.

PETSC_HAVE_CHACO_INT_ASSIGNMENT is set only for --download-trilinos. 
This macro makes difference only at 4 places:

At src/mat/partition/impls/chaco/chaco.c:8 and 
src/dm/impls/plex/plexpartition.c:1192:
#if defined(PETSC_HAVE_CHACO_INT_ASSIGNMENT)
#include <chaco.h>
#else
/* Older versions of Chaco do not have an include file */
PETSC_EXTERN int interface(int nvtxs, int *start, int *adjacency, int *vwgts,
                     float *ewgts, float *x, float *y, float *z, char 
*outassignname,
                     char *outfilename, short *assignment, int architecture, 
int ndims_tot,
                     int mesh_dims[3], double *goal, int global_method, int 
local_method,
                     int rqi_flag, int vmax, int ndims, double eigtol, long 
seed);
#endif

At src/mat/partition/impls/chaco/chaco.c:68 and 
src/dm/impls/plex/plexpartition.c:1227:
#if defined(PETSC_HAVE_CHACO_INT_ASSIGNMENT)
  int                   *assignment;
#else
  short                 *assignment;  
#endif

So it seems PETSc is not responsible for the different outputs.

In Trilinos, Chaco is shipped within the Seacas package. The notice at 
http://gsjaardema.github.io/seacas/#chaco 
<http://gsjaardema.github.io/seacas/#chaco> says
"The short *assignment argument to the interface function has been changed to 
int *assignment to permit decompositions with more than 32,768 processors."
They also say
"There are also now a CHACO_VERSION_MAJOR, CHACO_VERSION_MINOR, 
CHACO_VERSION_PATCH defines in chaco.h."
Looking there, the version is 3.0.0.

PETSc's configure --download-chaco gets this one: 
http://ftp.mcs.anl.gov/pub/petsc/externalpackages/Chaco-2.2-p2.tar.gz 
<http://ftp.mcs.anl.gov/pub/petsc/externalpackages/Chaco-2.2-p2.tar.gz>
It actually includes a git repo. There we can see it's the original author's 
version + some updates by Barry and Satish, mainly to avoid some name clashes.
The original version is probably this one: 
https://www3.cs.stonybrook.edu/~algorith/implement/chaco/distrib/Chaco-2.2.tar.gz
 
<https://www3.cs.stonybrook.edu/~algorith/implement/chaco/distrib/Chaco-2.2.tar.gz>
Looking at the contents of the tarball, these sources data back to 2000.
I tried comparing these two version but there are two many changes in 
formatting to identify crucial changes easily. But definitely these two 
versions differ and can give different results.

The main intent of my tests in src/dm/impls/plex/examples/tutorials/ex5.c is 
testing HDF5 I/O with different formats and I just needed to somehow distribute 
the sequential mesh read from exodus file. So I will replace chaco by simple 
here. But still it's a question whether we want to do something about the 
confusing situation with Chaco.

Vaclav

> 22. 4. 2018 v 17:56, Satish Balay <[email protected]>:
> 
> On Sun, 22 Apr 2018, Smith, Barry F. wrote:
> 
>>> It would be good to figure out exactly where the difference comes form
>>> [wrt chaco from trilinos vs separate install of chaco - or some other
>>> interaction from trilinos]
>> 
>>   Different random numbers being generated?
> 
> Its trilinos vs non-trilinos build of packages - so I don't think its 
> 'different random number generation' issue.
> 
> Trilinos install does:
> 
>    if self.libraries.check(self.dlib, "interface"):
>      self.addDefine('HAVE_CHACO',1)
>      self.addDefine('HAVE_CHACO_INT_ASSIGNMENT',1)
>    if self.libraries.check(self.dlib, "ML_Set_PrintLevel"):
>      self.addDefine('HAVE_ML',1)
>    if self.libraries.check(self.dlib, "Zoltan_LB_Partition"):
>      self.addDefine('HAVE_ZOLTAN',1)
>    if self.libraries.check(self.dlib, "ex_close"):
>      self.addDefine('HAVE_EXODUSII',1)
> 
> 
> For one there is different chaco code in petsc based on this flag
> HAVE_CHACO_INT_ASSIGNMENT. Its not clear to me if this is causing the
> difference.
> 
> --download-chaco is using 'Chaco-2.2-p2.tar.gz'. This matches the
> latest chaco tarball from their website [Chaco-2.2.tar.gz]. So I do
> not know if chaco packaged by trilinos has changes that cause this
> difference [clearly it added some change that resulted in us using the
> flag HAVE_CHACO_INT_ASSIGNMENT]
> 
> And then there is also exodus.. --download-exodus uses the latest
> snapshot from https://github.com/gsjaardema/seacas/
> 
> Satish

Reply via email to