If the plan is to eventually have a family of sympletic integrators, then I think this is a really bad name.
We should follow the pattern elsewhere, and have a main TSSYMPLECTIC type, and subtypes TSSYMPLECTICBASIC etc, and in command line we ask for -ts_type sympletic -ts_sympletic_type basic. Or, if there are no plans to have a family, then why to name it BASIC in the first place? PS: Not an expert in the field, feel free to hammer me about my ignorance. -- Lisandro Dalcin ============ Research Scientist Computer, Electrical and Mathematical Sciences & Engineering (CEMSE) Extreme Computing Research Center (ECRC) King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST) http://ecrc.kaust.edu.sa/ 4700 King Abdullah University of Science and Technology al-Khawarizmi Bldg (Bldg 1), Office # 0109 Thuwal 23955-6900, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia http://www.kaust.edu.sa Office Phone: +966 12 808-0459
